Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
How Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. stacks up
ALRM · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #626 of 1,667 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ALRM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALRM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 3.6% | 2.3% | 64% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 5.0% | 4.3% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 5.8% | 2.7% | 72% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 26.9% | 33.4% | 41% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALRM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 626 | 646.8B TWD (≈$20.1B) | 62 | 70 | |
| 626 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score