Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
How Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. stacks up
ALRM · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #911 of 1,669 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ALRM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 70% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -7.2% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALRM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 8.7% | 8.5% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | -7.2% | 11.1% | 30% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 7.3% | 4.8% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALRM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 911 | 161.3B TWD (≈$5.0B) | 45 | 57 | |
| 911 | 82.1B JPY (≈$558M) | 45 | 63 | |
| 911 | 119.7B JPY (≈$814M) | 45 | 35 | |
| 911 | 86.7B JPY (≈$590M) | 45 | 70 | |
| 911 | 3.2B USD | 45 | 67 | |
| 911 | 4.2B USD | 45 | 54 | |
| 911 | 5.2B USD | 45 | 61 | |
| 911 | 4.0B USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 911 | 555M CAD (≈$405M) | 45 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score