Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Studio City International Holdings Limited
How Studio City International Holdings Limited stacks up
MSC · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #138 of 356 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -25.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.7% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MSC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | -25.2% | 4.3% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 13.7% | 8.4% | 87% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 235.0% | 35.8% | 99% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MSC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 136 | 5.1B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 136 | 1.3B USD | 54 | 22 | |
| 138 | 21.7B USD | 53 | 58 | |
| 138 | 77.5B USD | 53 | 26 | |
| 138 | 206M USD | 53 | 45 | |
| 138 | 45M USD | 53 | 26 | |
| 138 | 24.1B USD | 53 | 63 | |
| 138 | 3.3B USD | 53 | 60 | |
| 144 | 4.6B USD | 52 | 80 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score