Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
How The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company stacks up
GT · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #708 of 1,553 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including GT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -198.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 81% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 15.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | -198.9% | 4.4% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 11.2% | 8.8% | 64% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 15.0% | 6.1% | 81% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 222.3% | 57.2% | 93% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 708 | 394M AUD (≈$260M) | 54 | 40 | |
| 708 | 4.4B SEK (≈$444M) | 54 | 33 | |
| 708 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.2B) | 54 | 58 | |
| 708 | 5.1B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 708 | 1.3B USD | 54 | 22 | |
| 708 | 49M EUR (≈$54M) | 54 | 35 | |
| 708 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 54 | 36 | |
| 708 | 28.4B INR (≈$341M) | 54 | 60 | |
| 708 | 526.8B ZAR (≈$29.0B) | 54 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score