Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GT · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,404 of 1,604 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including GT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | GT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | -1.3% | 7.3% | 14% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 3.6% | 6.4% | 31% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | -13.6% | 3.3% | 2% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | -61.5% | 7.7% | 3% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 18.1% | 30.2% | 26% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1,404 | 2.6B CNY (≈$365M) | 12 | 40 | |
| 1,404 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.8B CNY (≈$259M) |
| 12 |
| 52 |
| 1,404 | 263M BRL (≈$47M) | 12 | 37 |
| 1,404 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 12 | 34 |
| 1,404 | 1.3B USD | 12 | 22 |
| 1,404 | 3.7B NOK (≈$349M) | 12 | 27 |
| 1,404 | 18.6B USD | 12 | 43 |
| 1,404 | 151M EUR (≈$166M) | 12 | 8 |
| 1,404 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 12 | 25 |