Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMCR · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #723 of 1,553 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including AMCR · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | AMCR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 5.1% | 4.4% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 9.9% | 8.8% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 5.7% | 6.1% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 54.3% | 57.2% | 48% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 723 | 8.5B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 53 | 48 | |
| 723 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 13.7B HKD (≈$1.8B) |
| 53 |
| 45 |
| 723 | 351.2B KRW (≈$253M) | 53 | 33 |
| 723 | 6.0B MYR (≈$1.3B) | 53 | 54 |
| 723 | 21.7B USD | 53 | 58 |
| 723 | 877M GBP (≈$1.1B) | 53 | 47 |
| 723 | 77.5B USD | 53 | 26 |
| 723 | 32.7B INR (≈$393M) | 53 | 74 |
| 723 | 206M USD | 53 | 45 |