Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tapestry, Inc.
How Tapestry, Inc. stacks up
TPR · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #723 of 1,553 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including TPR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.3% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TPR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TPR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 6.0% | 4.4% | 65% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 7.5% | 8.8% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 7.5% | 6.1% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 2.9% | 57.2% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TPR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 723 | 206M USD | 53 | 45 | |
| 723 | 2.2B AUD (≈$1.5B) | 53 | 60 | |
| 723 | 45M USD | 53 | 26 | |
| 723 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 53 | 49 | |
| 723 | 24.1B USD | 53 | 63 | |
| 723 | 3.3B USD | 53 | 60 | |
| 723 | 6.2B EUR (≈$6.8B) | 53 | 49 | |
| 739 | 19.2B TWD (≈$594M) | 52 | 61 | |
| 739 | 656.8B KRW (≈$473M) | 52 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score