Ranked #689 of 751 · scores higher than 8% of peers · safety percentile 8
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
75 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including MPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 8 among Real Estate companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 94% of peers. Beta: 1.49 vs peer median 0.75
▼more borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: weaker than 89% of peers. Debt / equity: 2.16× vs peer median 0.80×
●Current ratio is close to the peer norm. Current ratio: 1.17× vs peer median 1.20×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MPT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
China Tianbao Group Development Company Limited1427.HK · Hong Kong
