Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MAC · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #693 of 751 · scores higher than 8% of peers · safety percentile 8
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including MAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 1.69× | 0.82× | 16% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 2.10 | 0.69 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 0.33× | 1.20× | 14% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 689 | 1.2B USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 690 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 11.0B HKD (≈$1.4B) |
| 8 |
| 52 |
| 691 | 55M EUR (≈$60M) | 8 | 9 |
| 692 | Unavailable | 8 |
| 693 | 7.3B USD | 8 | 23 |
| 694 | Unavailable | 8 | 47 |
| 695 | 4.5B USD | 7 | 49 |
| 696 | 338M SEK (≈$34M) | 7 | 30 |
| 697 | 72M HKD (≈$9M) | 7 | 4 |