Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cheniere Energy, Inc.
How Cheniere Energy, Inc. stacks up
LNG · against 35 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #23 of 36 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including LNG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 78% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -9.9% vs peer median -1.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -8.4% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 81% of peers. Revenue growth: 17.5% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LNG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LNG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 36 reported | 17.5% | 7.7% | 80% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 36 reported | -8.4% | 4.3% | 31% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 36 reported | -9.9% | -1.2% | 9% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LNG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120.0B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 1 | 109.0B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 3 | 111.6B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 4 | 33.9B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 4 | 58.0B USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 19 | 52.4B USD | 57 | 47 | |
| 20 | 64.0B USD | 56 | 37 | |
| 21 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 50 | 56 | |
| 22 | 433.8B BRL (≈$78.1B) | 49 | 41 | |
| 23 | 64.3B USD | 48 | 43 | |
| 24 | 66.8B USD | 47 | 49 | |
| 25 | 77.4B USD | 45 | 43 | |
| 26 | 89.1B USD | 35 | 59 | |
| 27 | 56.7B USD | 34 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score