Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SLB N.V.
How SLB N.V. stacks up
SLB · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #211 of 386 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including SLB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 72% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -31.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 70% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SLB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SLB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 2.5% | 0.5% | 53% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -31.0% | 1.0% | 28% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | 5.2% | -1.3% | 70% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SLB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 207 | 1.9B USD | 46 | 20 | |
| 211 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 45 | 68 | |
| 211 | 809M USD | 45 | 39 | |
| 211 | 767M CAD (≈$560M) | 45 | 35 | |
| 211 | 77.4B USD | 45 | 43 | |
| 215 | 83.2B JPY (≈$566M) | 44 | 39 | |
| 215 | 140.4B JPY (≈$955M) | 44 | 54 | |
| 215 | 104M USD | 44 | 33 | |
| 215 | 4.4B AUD (≈$2.9B) | 44 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score