Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Li Auto Inc.
How Li Auto Inc. stacks up
LI · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #475 of 1,553 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including LI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 99% of peers. EBITDA yield: 20.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -17.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | Not reported | 4.4% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | -58.9% | 8.8% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | -20.6% | 6.1% | 5% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 99.1% | 57.2% | 72% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 475 | 76.3B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 69 | 47 | |
| 475 | 8.6B USD | 69 | 49 | |
| 475 | 386M EUR (≈$424M) | 69 | 33 | |
| 475 | 3.2B USD | 69 | 42 | |
| 475 | 10.9B USD | 69 | 47 | |
| 475 | 4.4B USD | 69 | 53 | |
| 475 | 1.5B USD | 69 | 50 | |
| 475 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 69 | 70 | |
| 475 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 69 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score