Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LI · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #431 of 1,585 · scores higher than 73% of peers · safety percentile 73
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including LI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.22× | 0.50× | 72% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.54 | 0.56 | 53% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.81× | 1.48× | 64% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 427 | 4.6B USD | 73 | 80 | |
| 428 | 6.2B CNY (≈$864M) | 73 | 83 | |
| 429 | 108.4B JPY (≈$737M) | 73 | 53 | |
| 430 | 3.0B CNY (≈$424M) | 73 | 53 | |
| 431 | 10.9B USD | 73 | 47 | |
| 432 | 17.0B MYR (≈$3.7B) | 73 | 58 | |
| 433 | 5.7B CNY (≈$801M) | 73 | 51 | |
| 434 | 869M HKD (≈$111M) | 73 | 50 | |
| 435 | 76.3B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 73 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score