Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Legacy Housing Corporation
How Legacy Housing Corporation stacks up
LEGH · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #133 of 356 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including LEGH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.0% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LEGH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LEGH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 7.0% | 4.3% | 78% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 8.8% | 8.4% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 5.3% | 5.3% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 77.3% | 35.8% | 75% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LEGH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 129 | 5.9B USD | 56 | 75 | |
| 129 | 383M USD | 56 | 40 | |
| 129 | 6.6B USD | 56 | 42 | |
| 129 | 7.9B USD | 56 | 31 | |
| 133 | 727M USD | 55 | 62 | |
| 133 | 846M USD | 55 | 60 | |
| 133 | 2.3B USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 136 | 5.1B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 136 | 1.3B USD | 54 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score