Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MGM Resorts International
How MGM Resorts International stacks up
MGM · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #677 of 1,553 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MGM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 87% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 18.8% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MGM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 5.3% | 4.4% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 6.2% | 8.8% | 34% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 18.8% | 6.1% | 87% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 32.2% | 57.2% | 29% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MGM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 677 | 5.9B USD | 56 | 75 | |
| 677 | 383M USD | 56 | 40 | |
| 677 | 6.6B USD | 56 | 42 | |
| 677 | 3.5B DKK (≈$529M) | 56 | 50 | |
| 677 | 7.9B USD | 56 | 31 | |
| 677 | 1.1B GBP (≈$1.4B) | 56 | 40 | |
| 677 | 63M EUR (≈$69M) | 56 | 46 | |
| 677 | 114.8B THB (≈$3.2B) | 56 | 42 | |
| 692 | 2.9B CNY (≈$403M) | 55 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score