Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MGM Resorts International
How MGM Resorts International stacks up
MGM · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,003 of 1,604 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score161 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including MGM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 68% of peers. Return on invested capital: 3.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 66% of peers. Return on assets: 1.8% vs peer median 3.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 7.6% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MGM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 3.2% | 7.3% | 32% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 7.6% | 6.4% | 57% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 1.8% | 3.3% | 34% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 18.9% | 7.7% | 82% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 44.2% | 30.2% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MGM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1,003 | 104.7B JPY (≈$712M) | 37 | 61 | |
| 1,003 | 200.7B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 37 | 55 | |
| 1,003 | 8.6B USD | 37 | 49 | |
| 1,003 | 1.3B USD | 37 | 51 | |
| 1,003 | 7.9B USD | 37 | 31 | |
| 1,003 | 120M GBP (≈$156M) | 37 | 38 | |
| 1,019 | 4.2B CNY (≈$595M) | 36 | 35 | |
| 1,019 | 3.1B CNY (≈$433M) | 36 | 37 | |
| 1,019 | 72.66T KRW (≈$52.3B) | 36 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score