Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KMX · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #196 of 356 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score48 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including KMX · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | KMX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 4.0% | 4.1% | 48% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 4.4% | 8.3% | 20% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 15.4% | 5.2% | 91% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 84.4% | 36.2% | 78% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 62M USD | 98 | 79 | |
| 3 | 7.9B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.3B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 400M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 192 | 1.4B USD | 44 | 64 | |
| 196 | 25.9B USD | 43 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 196 | 16.9B USD | 43 | 58 |
| 196 | 3.2B USD | 43 | 45 |
| 196 | 7.5B USD | 43 | 22 |
| 200 | 15.8B USD | 42 | 53 |
| 200 | 5.4B USD | 42 | 46 |
| 200 | 6.6B USD | 42 | 52 |
| 200 | 810M USD | 42 | 47 |