Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Choice Hotels International, Inc.
How Choice Hotels International, Inc. stacks up
CHH · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #909 of 1,553 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CHH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger earnings yield, but weaker free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.1% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 6.0% | 4.4% | 65% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 6.4% | 8.8% | 36% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 2.1% | 6.1% | 26% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 2.7% | 57.2% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 909 | 67.7B JPY (≈$461M) | 41 | 45 | |
| 909 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score