Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RVLV · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #956 of 1,553 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score156 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including RVLV · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | RVLV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 4.7% | 4.4% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 7.0% | 8.8% | 40% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 1.8% | 6.1% | 25% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 35.2% | 57.2% | 33% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 956 | 332.9B USD | 38 | 45 | |
| 956 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 18.2B THB (≈$509M) |
| 38 |
| 48 |
| 956 | 5.5B USD | 38 | 36 |
| 956 | 378M USD | 38 | 26 |
| 956 | 1.5B USD | 38 | 63 |
| 956 | 27.1B USD | 38 | 58 |
| 956 | 700M CAD (≈$511M) | 38 | 41 |
| 972 | 2.6B CNY (≈$368M) | 37 | 48 |
| 972 | 4.4B CNY (≈$615M) | 37 | 63 |