Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FWRG · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #925 of 1,553 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including FWRG · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | FWRG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 2.1% | 4.4% | 32% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 6.1% | 8.8% | 34% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | -2.6% | 6.1% | 16% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 75.4% | 57.2% | 61% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 925 | 41.4B TWD (≈$1.3B) | 40 | 26 | |
| 925 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 13.4B CNY (≈$1.9B) |
| 40 |
| 59 |
| 925 | 2.8B CNY (≈$396M) | 40 | 41 |
| 925 | 4.4B USD | 40 | 45 |
| 925 | 841M USD | 40 | 47 |
| 925 | 42.7B INR (≈$513M) | 40 | 66 |
| 925 | 34.0B USD | 40 | 52 |
| 925 | 47.0B USD | 40 | 61 |
| 925 | 13.7B USD | 40 | 54 |