Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sea Limited
How Sea Limited stacks up
SE · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #925 of 1,553 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 68% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.9% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.4% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 3.4% | 4.4% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 5.9% | 8.8% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 10.0% | 6.1% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 26.4% | 57.2% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 925 | 4.4B USD | 40 | 45 | |
| 925 | 841M USD | 40 | 47 | |
| 925 | 42.7B INR (≈$513M) | 40 | 66 | |
| 925 | 34.0B USD | 40 | 52 | |
| 925 | 47.0B USD | 40 | 61 | |
| 925 | 13.7B USD | 40 | 54 | |
| 925 | 37M USD | 40 | 44 | |
| 925 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 40 | 64 | |
| 940 | 5.3B CNY (≈$748M) | 39 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score