Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kimco Realty Corporation
How Kimco Realty Corporation stacks up
KIM · against 54 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
46/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #25 of 55 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including KIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.4% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 5.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.9% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 56 reported | 3.4% | 3.9% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 53 reported | 5.3% | 5.5% | 42% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 38 reported | 7.0% | 5.4% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 56 reported | 61.3% | 51.8% | 60% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KIM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 67 | |
| 2 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 4 | 26.9B USD | 77 | 78 | |
| 4 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 77 | 36 | |
| 22 | 19.3B USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 22 | 14.0B USD | 48 | 40 | |
| 24 | 12.9B USD | 47 | 55 | |
| 25 | 4.28T JPY (≈$29.1B) | 46 | 47 | |
| 25 | 16.8B USD | 46 | 46 | |
| 27 | 14.8B USD | 45 | 51 | |
| 28 | 15.2B USD | 44 | 66 | |
| 28 | 19.6B USD | 44 | 48 | |
| 30 | 24.6B USD | 43 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score