Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MAA · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #342 of 663 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MAA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker free cash flow yield and earnings yield than most Real Estate peers.
| Metric | MAA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 2.9% | 5.3% | 35% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 6.4% | 5.3% | 67% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 4.6% | 6.8% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 39.9% | 112.8% | 12% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 336 | 42.1B INR (≈$506M) | 49 | 71 | |
| 342 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) |
| 48 |
| 67 |
| 342 | 19.3B USD | 48 | 54 |
| 342 | 3.4B SGD (≈$2.6B) | 48 | 54 |
| 342 | 14.0B USD | 48 | 40 |
| 342 | 473M CAD (≈$345M) | 48 | 37 |
| 342 | 54.4B USD | 48 | 57 |
| 342 | 608M CHF (≈$699M) | 48 | 52 |
| 349 | 1.2B SAR (≈$330M) | 47 | 53 |