Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
How Annaly Capital Management, Inc. stacks up
NLY · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
81/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #124 of 663 · scores higher than 81% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including NLY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Earnings yield: 21.7% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NLY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NLY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 22.7% | 5.3% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | -2.3% | 6.8% | 14% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 110.5% | 112.8% | 49% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NLY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 124 | 374M SGD (≈$284M) | 81 | 66 | |
| 124 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score