Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
How Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. stacks up
ARI · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
80/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #131 of 663 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including ARI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 80?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Cash exceeds market value plus debt, so EBITDA yield is not meaningful and is left out.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.9% vs peer median 6.5%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings yield: 15.4% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 33.2% | 5.3% | 97% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 6.9% | 6.8% | 51% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 406.1% | 112.8% | 91% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 124 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 81 | 79 | |
| 124 | 13.7B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 131 | 184M MYR (≈$40M) | 80 | 78 | |
| 131 | 1.1B MYR (≈$250M) | 80 | 59 | |
| 131 | 310M USD | 80 | 72 | |
| 131 | 2.1B EUR (≈$2.3B) | 80 | 58 | |
| 131 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 80 | 58 | |
| 131 | 391M EUR (≈$430M) | 80 | 69 | |
| 137 | 81.4B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 79 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score