Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Illinois Tool Works Inc.
How Illinois Tool Works Inc. stacks up
ITW · against 72 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
39/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #54 of 73 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including ITW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 65% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -2.8% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ITW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ITW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 73 reported | 4.3% | 7.7% | 29% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 69 reported | -2.8% | 8.6% | 26% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 72 reported | 0.8% | 6.8% | 17% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ITW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 5 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 52 | 68.5B USD | 45 | 50 | |
| 53 | 453.2B SEK (≈$45.3B) | 43 | 50 | |
| 54 | 15.68T JPY (≈$106.6B) | 39 | 41 | |
| 54 | 75.7B USD | 39 | 48 | |
| 54 | 81.6B USD | 39 | 46 | |
| 57 | 68.9B USD | 38 | 50 | |
| 57 | 49.9B USD | 38 | 42 | |
| 59 | 45.2B USD | 37 | 47 | |
| 59 | 91.3B USD | 37 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score