Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to 3M Company
How 3M Company stacks up
MMM · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,501 of 2,400 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including MMM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -21.4% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.3% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MMM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MMM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 2.3% | 4.4% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | -21.4% | 7.1% | 22% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 6.3% | 4.2% | 59% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MMM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,501 | 574M ILS (≈$155M) | 37 | 35 | |
| 1,501 | 45.2B USD | 37 | 47 | |
| 1,501 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 37 | 40 | |
| 1,501 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 37 | 37 | |
| 1,501 | 91.3B USD | 37 | 45 | |
| 1,501 | 9.3B USD | 37 | 47 | |
| 1,501 | 1.0B GBP (≈$1.4B) | 37 | 17 | |
| 1,525 | 65.0B CNY (≈$9.1B) | 36 | 37 | |
| 1,525 | 6.2B CNY (≈$863M) | 36 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score