Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMKTA · against 152 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #27 of 153 · scores higher than 83% of peers · safety percentile 73
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including IMKTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IMKTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 144 reported | 0.31× | 0.74× | 75% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 138 reported | 0.57 | 0.56 | 49% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 153 reported | 3.21× | 1.43× | 84% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 3 | 400M USD | 94 | 34 | |
| 4 | 607M USD | 93 | 67 | |
| 5 | 1.1B USD | 93 | 33 | |
| 23 | 1.3B USD | 78 | 66 | |
| 24 | 1.6B USD | 76 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 43 |
| 25 | 5.3B USD | 74 | 71 |
| 26 | 615M USD | 74 | 73 |
| 27 | 1.6B USD | 73 | 53 |
| 28 | 3.5B USD | 73 | 73 |
| 29 | 843M USD | 73 | 88 |
| 30 | 7.8B USD | 71 | 83 |
| 31 | 3.9B USD | 71 | 64 |