Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EDU · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #232 of 802 · scores higher than 71% of peers · safety percentile 71
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including EDU · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and beta, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EDU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.19× | 0.44× | 67% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.24 | 0.32 | 62% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.61× | 1.53× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 228 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 72 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 229 | 2.5B SGD (≈$1.9B) | 72 | 84 |
| 230 | 4.3B CNY (≈$599M) | 71 | 36 |
| 231 | 265.7B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 71 | 76 |
| 232 | 7.8B USD | 71 | 83 |
| 233 | 5.0B CNY (≈$707M) | 71 | 66 |
| 234 | 107.0B JPY (≈$727M) | 71 | 67 |
| 235 | 4.6B CNY (≈$638M) | 71 | 42 |
| 236 | 3.9B USD | 71 | 64 |