Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TPB · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #181 of 802 · scores higher than 78% of peers · safety percentile 78
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including TPB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TPB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.68× | 0.44× | 36% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.94 | 0.32 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 5.67× | 1.53× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 177 | 242.0B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 78 | 58 | |
| 178 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 332M USD |
| 78 |
| 43 |
| 179 | 13.7B USD | 78 | 59 |
| 180 | 19.3B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 78 | 67 |
| 181 | 1.3B USD | 78 | 66 |
| 182 | 8.8B ZAR (≈$485M) | 77 | 64 |
| 183 | 3.5B CNY (≈$490M) | 77 | 60 |
| 184 | 2.6B EUR (≈$2.8B) | 77 | 58 |
| 185 | 187.9B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 77 | 62 |