Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMKTA · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #218 of 802 · scores higher than 73% of peers · safety percentile 73
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including IMKTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IMKTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.31× | 0.44× | 57% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.57 | 0.32 | 24% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 3.21× | 1.53× | 82% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 214 | 211.0B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 73 | 69 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 215 |
| 11.2B CNY (≈$1.6B) |
| 73 |
| 42 |
| 216 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 73 | 73 |
| 217 | 2.0B SGD (≈$1.5B) | 73 | 64 |
| 218 | 1.6B USD | 73 | 53 |
| 219 | 3.5B USD | 73 | 73 |
| 220 | 4.6B CNY (≈$650M) | 73 | 57 |
| 221 | 843M USD | 73 | 88 |
| 222 | 29.73T IDR (≈$1.8B) | 72 | 60 |