Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IIPR · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #90 of 751 · scores higher than 88% of peers · safety percentile 88
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including IIPR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IIPR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.33× | 0.82× | 81% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.42 | 0.69 | 8% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 4.58× | 1.20× | 92% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 86 | 233M CAD (≈$170M) | 89 | 29 | |
| 87 | 8.7B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 88 | 13.0B TWD (≈$403M) | 88 | 58 | |
| 89 | 8.7B THB (≈$243M) | 88 | 58 | |
| 90 | 1.5B USD | 88 | 72 | |
| 91 | 4.7B HKD (≈$597M) | 88 | 73 | |
| 92 | 5.7B HKD (≈$724M) | 88 | 26 | |
| 93 | 2.7B CNY (≈$384M) | 88 | 25 | |
| 94 | 14.2B TWD (≈$440M) | 88 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score