Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CTRE · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #87 of 751 · scores higher than 89% of peers · safety percentile 89
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including CTRE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CTRE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.27× | 0.82× | 84% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.77 | 0.69 | 44% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 3.30× | 1.20× | 87% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 83 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 89 | 72 | |
| 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 5.6B TRY (≈$168M) |
| 89 |
| 90 |
| 85 | 3.1B CNY (≈$435M) | 89 | 25 |
| 86 | 233M CAD (≈$170M) | 89 | 29 |
| 87 | 8.7B USD | 89 | 77 |
| 88 | 13.0B TWD (≈$403M) | 88 | 58 |
| 89 | 8.7B THB (≈$243M) | 88 | 58 |
| 90 | 1.5B USD | 88 | 72 |
| 91 | 4.7B HKD (≈$597M) | 88 | 73 |