Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Installed Building Products, Inc.
How Installed Building Products, Inc. stacks up
IBP · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #202 of 356 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including IBP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IBP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IBP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 4.4% | 4.3% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 7.5% | 8.4% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 5.2% | 5.3% | 49% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 11.4% | 35.8% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IBP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 200 | 4.7B USD | 42 | 52 | |
| 200 | 7.9B USD | 42 | 26 | |
| 202 | 5.4B USD | 41 | 46 | |
| 202 | 12.2B USD | 41 | 60 | |
| 202 | 5.6B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 202 | 418M USD | 41 | 53 | |
| 202 | 4.7B USD | 41 | 61 | |
| 207 | 4.4B USD | 40 | 45 | |
| 207 | 841M USD | 40 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score