Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
VFC · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #894 of 1,553 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including VFC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | VFC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 3.4% | 4.4% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 7.3% | 8.8% | 42% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 7.4% | 6.1% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 47.2% | 57.2% | 42% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 894 | 260.6B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 42 | 69 | |
| 894 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) |
| 42 |
| 30 |
| 894 | 15.0B EUR (≈$16.4B) | 42 | 50 |
| 894 | 4.7B USD | 42 | 52 |
| 894 | 7.9B USD | 42 | 26 |
| 909 | 3.4B CNY (≈$470M) | 41 | 39 |
| 909 | 3.0B CNY (≈$417M) | 41 | 60 |
| 909 | 732.9B KRW (≈$528M) | 41 | 61 |
| 909 | 15.8B TWD (≈$488M) | 41 | 33 |