Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
How Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. stacks up
IAS · against 132 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #71 of 133 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score15 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including IAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 4.3% vs peer median 6.0%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 3.7% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 122 reported | 4.3% | 6.5% | 38% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 132 reported | Not reported | 8.9% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 130 reported | 3.7% | 2.8% | 60% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 125 reported | 4.5% | 5.7% | 44% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 133 reported | 77.4% | 44.4% | 85% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 385.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 98 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2.9B USD | 97 | 80 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 61 | |
| 5 | 1.0B USD | 96 | 87 | |
| 66 | 8.1B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 52 | 51 | |
| 66 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 52 | 23 | |
| 66 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 52 | 51 | |
| 70 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 51 | 64 | |
| 71 | 1.7B USD | 50 | 54 | |
| 72 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 49 | 54 | |
| 73 | 8.7B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 48 | 26 | |
| 73 | 17.5B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 48 | 51 | |
| 75 | 2.3B USD | 47 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score