IAS Communication ServicesBeta data

Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.

$10.34+0.00%

Price as of close on Dec 22, 2025 · Financials updated Sep 30, 2026

Basics

Sector: Communication Services
Industry: Advertising Agencies
Country: United States
Market cap: 1.7B USD
Enterprise value: 1.6B USD
Full-time employees: 902

Overall health

Strength: lower risk than most peers: more short-term liquidity and less debt relative to equitylower risk: more liquidity and less debt vs equity
Drawback: its shares are priced higher than most peers relative to what it earnspriced higher than peers for its earnings
Drawback: its share price swings more than most peers’ (beta 1.57 vs a peer median of 0.65)bigger price swings (beta 1.57 vs peers 0.65)
About average: profitability
Not enough data: growth

Would rank #197 of 454 fully scored communication services companies (top 44%)

Partial overall score — 3/4 categories available.

See how it ranks against its peers

Worth knowing

More volatile share price. Beta 1.57: tends to move more than the market.
Integral Ad Science's shares have swung more with the market than most peers' (beta 1.57, above the market's 1.0).

StockQuotient Score

54/ 100

Oct 5 53 → Nov 4 54 (+1)

Fundamentals: Yahoo Finance, not primary filings

Valuation

Is the price right?

37/100

Weak

2/3 inputs reported · Partial data

Why

Close to the peer norm on every measure.

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Sector-normalized EBITDA, earnings, and free cash flow yields.

Earnings yield2.7%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported value30% base weight · Z-score -0.08Sector median: 0.0294 · MAD: 0.0294

EBITDA yield6.5%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported value50% base weight · Z-score -0.32Sector median: 0.0857 · MAD: 0.0649

Free cash flow yieldUnavailable

Missing · left out of the score · no sector data, so not countedNot counted · remaining weights rescaledSector median: 0.0740 · MAD: 0.0593

Other data (not scored)

Book yield64.0%

Yahoo FinanceReported valueInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.4780 · MAD: 0.3375

Growth

Is it growing?

Insufficient data

Insufficient data: 0 of 3 inputs reported (at least 2 needed). We leave it blank rather than fill the gap with a made-up middle value.

Profitability

Does it earn well?

50/100

Moderate

2/3 inputs reported · Partial data

Why

Helped by:

▲ ROA

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Return on invested capital, operating margin, and return on assets.

Operating marginUnavailable

Missing · left out of the score · no sector data, so not countedNot counted · remaining weights rescaledSector median: 0.0818 · MAD: 0.0789

Return on assets3.7%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported value33% base weight · Z-score 0.31Sector median: 0.0272 · MAD: 0.0318

Return on invested capital4.3%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported value33% base weight · Z-score -0.24Sector median: 0.0598 · MAD: 0.0706

Other data (not scored)

Gross margin77.4%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported valueInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.4656 · MAD: 0.1827

Return on equity4.5%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported valueInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.0529 · MAD: 0.1007

Risk

Debt, liquidity, price swings

Lower

Lower relative risk

3/3 inputs reported · High confidence

Why

Stronger than most peers on:

▲ Current ratio
▲ Debt / equity

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Relative to sector peers: 0 = lower relative risk · 1 = moderate · 2 = higher. Based on leverage, beta and liquidity.

Beta1.57

Yahoo Finance · 5-year monthly beta vs the marketReported value33% base weight · Z-score -3.20Sector median: 0.6525 · MAD: 0.2880

Current ratio4.43×

Yahoo FinanceReported value33% base weight · Z-score 4.38Sector median: 1.3848 · MAD: 0.6948

Debt / equity0.02×

Yahoo FinanceReported value33% base weight · Z-score 1.04Sector median: 0.3697 · MAD: 0.3335

Valuation, growth and profitability scores: higher is better. Risk: 0 is lower, 2 is higher. Risk is a relative proxy, not a bankruptcy probability. Scores depend on available sector peers.

Questions investors ask about Integral Ad Science

Is Integral Ad Science getting weaker?: Filing-by-filing changes are tracked only for companies that file with the US SEC. Its overall score is unchanged at 54/100 since Oct 28, 2026.
How is Integral Ad Science valued vs its peers?: Priced higher than most peers relative to what it earns. Valuation scores 37/100 against 512 communication services peers.
Is Integral Ad Science growing?: Insufficient data: 0 of 3 inputs reported (at least 2 needed).
How profitable is Integral Ad Science?: About as profitable as its peers. Profitability scores 50/100 against 512 communication services peers. Return on assets 3.7% vs a peer median of 2.7% (stronger than 61% of peers).Return on assets 3.7% vs peers 2.7% (stronger than 61% of peers).
How risky is Integral Ad Science?: Lower risk relative to 512 communication services peers, judged on debt, liquidity and share-price swings. Current ratio 4.43× vs a peer median of 1.38× (stronger than 91% of peers).Current ratio 4.43× vs peers 1.38× (stronger than 91% of peers). Beta 1.57 vs a peer median of 0.65 (weaker than 94% of peers).Beta 1.57 vs peers 0.65 (weaker than 94% of peers). A relative measure, not a bankruptcy probability.

Industry valuation context

Sector: Communication Services · 67 companies

Valuations in Communication Services are within their usual range since 2016.

46% of months since 2016 were valued lower than now.
22% of companies are in the most expensive fifth of their own price-to-sales history.
Over 24 months, company values +13% and earnings +11% (medians): earnings grew faster than prices.
Median price-to-sales is −6% vs the whole market, against a usual −7%.

2016Shaded: most expensive fifth of its range2026

Shown for Communication Services: too few Advertising Agencies companies have a long enough history of their own.

Financials

Detailed annual statements come from structured SEC filing data, which most US companies and some foreign filers provide. They aren’t available for this company yet.

IAS price history

Price history is added with the daily price update and will appear after the next one.

Similar companies

Sector leaderboards

Marvelous Inc.7844.T93/ 100

Telecomunicações Brasileiras S.A. - TelebrasTELB3.SA89/ 100

JYP Entertainment Corporation035900.KQ87/ 100

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…

Overall health

Strength: lower risk than most peers: more short-term liquidity and less debt relative to equitylower risk: more liquidity and less debt vs equity

Drawback: its shares are priced higher than most peers relative to what it earnspriced higher than peers for its earnings

Drawback: its share price swings more than most peers’ (beta 1.57 vs a peer median of 0.65)bigger price swings (beta 1.57 vs peers 0.65)

About average: profitability

Not enough data: growth

Would rank #197 of 454 fully scored communication services companies (top 44%)

Partial overall score — 3/4 categories available.

See how it ranks against its peers

Questions investors ask about Integral Ad Science

Is Integral Ad Science getting weaker?

Filing-by-filing changes are tracked only for companies that file with the US SEC. Its overall score is unchanged at 54/100 since Oct 28, 2026.

How is Integral Ad Science valued vs its peers?

Priced higher than most peers relative to what it earns. Valuation scores 37/100 against 512 communication services peers.

Is Integral Ad Science growing?

Insufficient data: 0 of 3 inputs reported (at least 2 needed).

How profitable is Integral Ad Science?

About as profitable as its peers. Profitability scores 50/100 against 512 communication services peers. Return on assets 3.7% vs a peer median of 2.7% (stronger than 61% of peers).Return on assets 3.7% vs peers 2.7% (stronger than 61% of peers).

How risky is Integral Ad Science?

Lower risk relative to 512 communication services peers, judged on debt, liquidity and share-price swings. Current ratio 4.43× vs a peer median of 1.38× (stronger than 91% of peers).Current ratio 4.43× vs peers 1.38× (stronger than 91% of peers). Beta 1.57 vs a peer median of 0.65 (weaker than 94% of peers).Beta 1.57 vs peers 0.65 (weaker than 94% of peers). A relative measure, not a bankruptcy probability.