Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
How Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. stacks up
IAS · against 509 other Communication Services companies
Profitability
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #253 of 510 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score51 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including IAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 4.3% vs peer median 6.0%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 3.7% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 460 reported | 4.3% | 6.0% | 44% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 506 reported | Not reported | 8.2% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 496 reported | 3.7% | 2.7% | 61% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 475 reported | 4.5% | 5.4% | 48% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 513 reported | 77.4% | 46.2% | 86% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 67.5B INR (≈$811M) | 100 | 35 | |
| 3 | 18.2B JPY (≈$124M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 82.5B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 253 | 4.2B HKD (≈$540M) | 50 | 68 | |
| 253 | 3.1B CNY (≈$438M) | 50 | 62 | |
| 253 | 24.0B USD | 50 | 52 | |
| 253 | 325M USD | 50 | 46 | |
| 253 | 1.7B USD | 50 | 54 | |
| 253 | 923M DKK (≈$138M) | 50 | 66 | |
| 259 | 302M HKD (≈$39M) | 49 | 59 | |
| 259 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 49 | 54 | |
| 259 | 11.0B USD | 49 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score