Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
How Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. stacks up
IAS · against 149 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #80 of 150 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score12 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including IAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 4.3% vs peer median 6.0%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 62% of peers. Return on assets: 3.7% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 146 reported | 4.3% | 7.8% | 37% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 149 reported | Not reported | 8.9% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 151 reported | 3.7% | 3.2% | 56% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 137 reported | 4.5% | 7.4% | 41% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 151 reported | 77.4% | 56.5% | 83% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 119.6B USD | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 3.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2.7B USD | 97 | 80 | |
| 3 | 18.0B USD | 97 | 82 | |
| 5 | 1.1B USD | 96 | 87 | |
| 78 | 634M USD | 51 | 27 | |
| 78 | 511M USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score