Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Highwoods Properties, Inc.
How Highwoods Properties, Inc. stacks up
HIW · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #101 of 180 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including HIW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth than most Real Estate peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 29.3% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HIW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HIW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 3.0% | 5.9% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 29.3% | 13.9% | 64% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | -0.1% | 4.8% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HIW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 96 | 430M USD | 52 | 34 | |
| 96 | 7.3B USD | 52 | 23 | |
| 99 | 7.9B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 99 | 26.9B USD | 51 | 78 | |
| 101 | 3.5B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 101 | 19.6B USD | 50 | 48 | |
| 101 | 14.8B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 104 | 24.6B USD | 49 | 42 | |
| 104 | 62.3B USD | 49 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score