Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SBA Communications Corporation
How SBA Communications Corporation stacks up
SBAC · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #363 of 731 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including SBAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 14.1% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SBAC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SBAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 5.4% | 3.0% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | 14.1% | 11.1% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 1.9% | 3.8% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SBAC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 363 | 682.7B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 50 | 57 | |
| 363 | 3.5B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 363 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 50 | 57 | |
| 363 | 936M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 50 | 62 | |
| 363 | 19.6B USD | 50 | 48 | |
| 363 | 14.8B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 370 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 49 | 67 | |
| 370 | 10.8B CAD (≈$7.9B) | 49 | 40 | |
| 370 | 24.6B USD | 49 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score