Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NNN REIT, Inc.
How NNN REIT, Inc. stacks up
NNN · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #356 of 731 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including NNN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Real Estate peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -3.7% vs peer median 11.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NNN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NNN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 6.5% | 3.0% | 63% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | -3.7% | 11.1% | 33% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 6.1% | 3.8% | 59% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NNN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 348 | 7.3B USD | 52 | 23 | |
| 356 | 314.6B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 51 | 44 | |
| 356 | 1.3B SGD (≈$961M) | 51 | 62 | |
| 356 | 1.75T INR (≈$21.1B) | 51 | 41 | |
| 356 | 7.9B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 356 | 26.9B USD | 51 | 78 | |
| 356 | 816M EUR (≈$898M) | 51 | 56 | |
| 356 | 1.1B CHF (≈$1.3B) | 51 | 46 | |
| 363 | 188.6B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 50 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score