Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HAS · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,422 of 1,585 · scores higher than 10% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including HAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 5.31× | 0.50× | 4% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.44 | 0.56 | 61% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.66× | 1.48× | 58% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,418 | 4.6B USD | 11 | 39 | |
| 1,419 | 422M HKD (≈$54M) | 10 | 21 | |
| 1,420 | 77.5B USD | 10 | 26 | |
| 1,421 | 210M HKD (≈$27M) | 10 | 7 | |
| 1,422 | 16.6B USD | 10 | 58 | |
| 1,423 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 10 | 27 | |
| 1,424 | 3.6B USD | 10 | 15 | |
| 1,425 | 414M USD | 10 | 36 | |
| 1,426 | 13.4B THB (≈$376M) | 10 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score