Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gates Industrial Corporation Ltd.
How Gates Industrial Corporation Ltd. stacks up
GTES · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
64/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #96 of 473 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including GTES · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.5% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GTES, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GTES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 5.7% | 3.0% | 84% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 9.1% | 6.3% | 75% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 6.1% | 3.3% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 56.6% | 32.3% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GTES| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 87 | 4.4B USD | 65 | 62 | |
| 87 | 364M USD | 65 | 71 | |
| 96 | 1.1B USD | 64 | 32 | |
| 96 | 16.5B USD | 64 | 57 | |
| 96 | 6.2B USD | 64 | 62 | |
| 96 | 12.0B USD | 64 | 53 | |
| 96 | 6.6B USD | 64 | 52 | |
| 96 | 774M USD | 64 | 69 | |
| 96 | 15.1B USD | 64 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score