Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BrightView Holdings, Inc.
How BrightView Holdings, Inc. stacks up
BV · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #851 of 2,394 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score240 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including BV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 86% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.4% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | -2.0% | 3.8% | 14% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 12.7% | 7.0% | 79% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | -2.2% | 3.7% | 20% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 112.9% | 50.5% | 84% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 851 | 734.2B JPY (≈$5.0B) | 64 | 61 | |
| 851 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score