Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Textron Inc.
How Textron Inc. stacks up
TXT · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #851 of 2,394 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score240 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including TXT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.2% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TXT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TXT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 6.1% | 3.8% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 9.4% | 7.0% | 64% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 5.0% | 3.7% | 61% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 53.4% | 50.5% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TXT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 851 | 6.6B USD | 64 | 52 | |
| 851 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score