Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZIM · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1 of 2,394 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score252 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including ZIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
| Metric | ZIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 3.9% | 3.8% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 6.5% | 7.0% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 42.6% | 3.7% | 96% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 108.3% | 50.5% | 83% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.5B USD |
| 100 |
| 78 |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 |
| 13 | 1.4B HKD (≈$174M) | 99 | 53 |
| 13 | 4.7B CNY (≈$654M) | 99 | 90 |
| 13 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 |
| 13 | 1.7B HKD (≈$221M) | 99 | 54 |