Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gladstone Commercial Corporation
How Gladstone Commercial Corporation stacks up
GOOD · against 182 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #65 of 183 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score8 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including GOOD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 36.2% vs peer median 26.8%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 75% of peers. Return on assets: 3.4% vs peer median 2.1%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 75% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.4% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GOOD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GOOD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 179 reported | 5.4% | 3.6% | 67% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 160 reported | 36.2% | 23.6% | 68% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 185 reported | 3.4% | 1.9% | 67% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 177 reported | 7.3% | 5.5% | 59% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 186 reported | 79.1% | 66.3% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GOOD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 14.3B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 20.7B USD | 98 | 48 | |
| 5 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 61 | 14.9B USD | 72 | 61 | |
| 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score