Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Global Net Lease, Inc.
How Global Net Lease, Inc. stacks up
GNL · against 759 other Real Estate companies
Profitability
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #241 of 760 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score76 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including GNL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and operating margin, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 85% of peers. Return on assets: -0.3% vs peer median 2.1%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 61% of peers. Operating margin: 39.6% vs peer median 26.8%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on invested capital: 10.6% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GNL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GNL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 739 reported | 10.6% | 3.4% | 90% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 728 reported | 39.6% | 26.8% | 61% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 741 reported | -0.3% | 2.1% | 15% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 721 reported | -1.0% | 5.2% | 21% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 763 reported | 85.7% | 53.9% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GNL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 310M USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 5 | 91.4B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 233 | 42.1B INR (≈$506M) | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score