Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CUZ · against 759 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #271 of 760 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score76 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including CUZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
| Metric | CUZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 739 reported | 6.8% | 3.4% | 81% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 728 reported | 68.0% | 26.8% | 89% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 741 reported | 0.1% | 2.1% | 19% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 721 reported | 0.2% | 5.2% | 25% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 763 reported | 67.8% | 53.9% | 68% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 310M USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 5 | 91.4B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 271 | 166.1B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 56 |
| 271 | 24.4B THB (≈$683M) | 64 | 69 |
| 271 | 1.8B AUD (≈$1.2B) | 64 | 51 |
| 271 | 3.0B CAD (≈$2.2B) | 64 | 46 |
| 271 | 4.8B USD | 64 | 52 |
| 271 | 2.1B CAD (≈$1.6B) | 64 | 44 |
| 271 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 64 | 67 |
| 279 | 9.4B TWD (≈$291M) | 63 | 50 |
| 279 | 6.4B SAR (≈$1.7B) | 63 | 61 |